The Lion in Winter | 
 enlarge | Director: Anthony Harvey (ii)
Actors: Peter O'toole, Katharine Hepburn, Anthony Hopkins, John Castle (ii), Nigel Terry
Studio: MGM (Video & DVD)
Category: DVD
List Price: $14.98
Buy New: $4.48
You Save: $10.50 (70%)
New (48) Used (33) from $4.45
Rating:  190 reviews
Sales Rank: 2092
Format: Anamorphic, Closed-captioned, Color, Dvd-video, Subtitled, Widescreen, Ntsc
Languages: English (Original Language), French (Subtitled), Spanish (Subtitled)
Rating: PG (Parental Guidance Suggested)
Region: 1
Aspect Ratio: 2.35:1
Picture Format: Anamorphic Widescreen
Number Of Discs: 1
Running Time: 135 Minutes
Shipping Weight (lbs): 0.2
Dimensions (in): 7.5 x 5 x 0.6
MPN: D1001587D
ISBN: 0792849205
UPC: 027616858979
EAN: 9780792849209
ASIN: B000056HEA
Theatrical Release Date: October 30, 1968
Release Date: June 19, 2001
Availability: Usually ships in 1-2 business days
Shipping: Expedited shipping available
Shipping: International shipping available
Condition: ******BRAND NEW****** THE SOURCE FOR RARE MEDIA, THOUSANDS OF CUSTOMERS SATISFIED, AND OVER 250 000 ITEMS IN STOCK, BUY FROM A TRUSTED SOURCE, ESTABLISHED SINCE 1998 - INETVIDEO ~~~
| |
| Similar Items:
|
| Editorial Reviews:
Amazon.com
In this 12th-century version of Who's Afraid of Virginia Woolf?, Henry II of England (Peter O'Toole) and his wife, Eleanor of Aquitaine (Katharine Hepburn), meet on Christmas Eve to discuss the future of the throne. These two are having slight marital problems, as she is kept in captivity most of the year for raising a rebellion against him, and he flaunts his young mistress. Then there are the problems raised by their three treacherous and traitorous sons. James Goldman won an Oscar for the brilliant screenplay, based on his Broadway play. It is a tad wordy, as the action is kept to a minimum, but those words are sharp as daggers. The humor is wicked and black and delivered with very dry, dead-on precision. Sparks fly and the screen sizzles whenever Hepburn and O'Toole tango, which is often. Both were nominated for Academy Awards for their vigorous performances. (She won; he didn't.) There's also an infamous homo-erotic exchange between Philip of France (Timothy Dalton) and Richard the Lionhearted (Anthony Hopkins). Both actors were making their feature-film debuts. --Rochelle O'Gorman
Description
Katharine Hepburn delivers an amazing (Variety), OscarA(r)-winning* performance 'that must be seen to be believed (Boxoffice) in this dazzling (Los Angeles Times) all-star film that is not to be missed. Behind the great stone walls of an English castle, the world's most powerful empire is in crisis. Three sons struggle to win their father's favoras well as his crown. King Henry II (Peter O'toole) and his queen, Eleanor (Katharine Hepburn), engage ina battle of royal wits that pits elder son Richard (Anthony Hopkins) against his brothers, while the cunning King Philip of France (Timothy Dalton) takes advantage of the internal fracturing in his bid to destroy their kingdom. *1968: Actress
|
| Customer Reviews: Read 185 more reviews...
 Even better the fourth time! June 30, 2008
DS in Houston (Houston, TX)
0 out of 2 found this review helpful
I saw the stage play forty years ago, and it was great. And every ten years or so, I watch the movie and enjoy it more every time.
But I have a question...
Why did James Goldman portray Henry II as a bisexual and pedophile ("Alais, in my time I've known...contessas, milkmaids,
courtesans...and novices, whores, gypsies, jades...and little boys..."), and his son Richard the Lionhearted as a homosexual?
Couldn't the story have been just as interesting and compelling, or even more so, without the homosexual fabrications? There was no historical or artistic reason to include any of that.
So, why? Could it be that Goldman was himself homosexual? Was he a closeted forerunner of today's hollywood writers, who include a homosexual character in nearly every television show and movie, to advance their own social agenda?
What other reason would there be?
 Well-acted but depressing; historically doubtful June 9, 2008
Ayisha Synnestvedt (Bryn Athyn, PA USA)
This is a great movie to watch once. But while it is clever, it is not a feel-good film. One could sum up the plot as "scheming humans making themselves and others as miserable as possible".
As a period film, it is a mix of accuracy and inaccuracy. Henry II washing his face with ice water is a good touch, but the rest of his surroundings are unrealistically primitive. 12th century life was far richer than we give it credit for. The castle should have been teeming with servants and retainers. The clothes are too simple and drab: trade routes imported materials and food as far afield as China. Henry II was arguably the most powerful man in Europe at the time--he controlled more land in modern France alone than the King of France did--and his surroundings would have reflected his status.
Henry II, Eleanor, and their three living sons did indeed meet for Christmas in 1183. But while the issues addressed--the question of succession and lordship of the Aquitaine--were real issues, the playwright has combined over 15 years of family strife into a couple days.
Henry II's fondness for his youngest son John is exaggerated: Henry wouldn't have dreamt of leaving the kingship to a younger son. The film shows John as having the IQ of a doornob, while administrative records from his reign indicate he was quite intelligent.
The film's portrayal of Richard is out of date: his weakness of character is entwined with his alleged homosexuality. Also, primary sources indicate Richard was heterosexual; the theory that he was homosexual or bisexual is based on a modern interpretation of 12th century social norms. To add insult to inaccuracy, the film shows Richard as a thick-skulled stubborn jock, while the primary sources I've read indicate he was a remarkably savvy politician and diplomat.
For a balanced, historiographically thorough treatment of Richard, read Richard I by John Gillingham It is a play-by-play history of his life, so the casual reader may want to skip parts, and refer to the index for specific issues. For a well-researched, highly readable cross-section of Anglo-Norman life in the 12th and early 13th centuries, read 1215: the Year of Magna Carta
While it is historically misleading, The Lion in Winter provides a gripping interpretation of Plantagenet family dynamics, and is a worthwhile buy for anyone who appreciates talented stage-acting and acerbic dialogue.
 The Lion in Winter May 12, 2008
L. Santackas (providence,ri usa)
2 out of 2 found this review helpful
This is one of the best movies made! As close to Shakespeare as you can get in modern times. The dialogue is incredible,especially in the interaction of Hepburn and O'Toole. They also seem to be having such a good time with it.The whole cast couldn't have been chosen more perfectly.The tension between the brothers as they back stab at the machinations of their parents is palatable.For lovers of historical drama this is a must. For lovers of great dialogue and charisma between actors this is a must. For lovers of great film making in general this is a must!
A stunning portrayal of greed and corruption, and the price we pay for power... May 1, 2008
Andrew Ellington (Mulholland Drive)
3 out of 3 found this review helpful
Katherine Hepburn is considered one of the greatest actresses to ever grace the big screen. In fact, many of her devoted fans have coined the nickname `Kate the Great' when referencing this cinematic icon. In this day and age of modern cinema being compared to this legend is one of the highest compliments any actress can hope to receive. Sadly, I have not seen many of Hepburn's films and so I am really in the dark as to the extent of her talent. But last night I sat down to watch `The Lion in Winter', a film I had heard much about but knew very little of. I am now convinced, from just this single performance, that all the praise and admiration is justly deserved (as was that Oscar win).
With quick wit and a masterfully dead-panned delivery, Katherine Hepburn scorches the screen as Queen Eleanor of Aquitaine, the Achilles-Heel to her husband King Henry II. Eleanor and Henry do not have the happiest marriage, Henry keeping Eleanor locked away for the majority of the year because of her rebellion against him. He allows her to visit for the Christmas holiday and it is during this visit that tension abounds, tension that leads to betrayal and a total collapse of family. While Eleanor is visiting she rallies behind their eldest son Richard for his right to the throne, but Henry is determined to make his youngest son John the next King. Left in the middle is Geoffrey, perhaps the most cunning of all, who devises a way of secluding the throne for himself.
Adding to the internal tension within the family ranks is the pressure being put upon King Henry by King Philip of France to give his sister Alais' hand to Richard in marriage. King Philip is a young King, but a crafty one and soon he is finding ways to destroy King Henry's rule from within his own castle walls.
The acting, for the most part, is flawless. I've already mentioned my adoration of Katherine Hepburn's marvelous performance, but much must be said for Peter O'Toole as well. It's still so shocking to me that he has yet to win an acting Oscar. The Academy must feel really stupid right about now. His fiery delivery as King Henry is brilliant to witness. Anthony Hopkins, who makes his big screen debut here, is also a marvel to watch. It's apparent from this early performance that he would one day become one of our greatest working actors. His portrayal of the determined yet haunted Richard shows control and maturity beyond his experience. Timothy Dalton also delivers a fine debut performance as King Philip, infusing enough charisma to make his cunning all the more believable. Jane Merrow is sympathetic as Alais and John Castle is phenomenal as Geoffrey. I was astounded by the depth he brought to his character, making him the most fascinating character in my humble opinion. In fact, the acting in this film is so masterful that I am pained to have to single out Nigel Terry as the biggest drawback to an otherwise brilliant film. His portrayal of John is excruciating to watch. Instead of making John a believable buffoon he creates a campy feel that takes away from the impact of the film. Thankfully the rest of the cast is so brilliant that they make up for his lack of impression.
I will add as a side note that I find it ironic how, while watching this movie, I couldn't help but draw comparisons to the marvelous Glenn Close when watching Hepburn, noticing how their acting style, even their facial features are very similar. I say this is ironic because come to find out, Close also took on the role of Queen Eleanor in the TV adaptation of `The Lion in Winter'.
Small world.
Much has been said of the Oscar winning script by James Goldman (adapted from his stage play) and much should be said. The dialog is tight and witty and, while the film is a tad wordy, it flows beautifully, remaining fresh and natural throughout. Anthony Harvey directs the film with conviction and dedication, and it shows. From the opening credits to the final frame he beautifully captures the mood presented by the subject.
`The Lion in Winter' is a stunning portrayal of the power of greed and the danger of power. Watching this dysfunctional family crumble at its very foundation is unsettling yet captivating. The film does to a degree feel dated; you can't escape that. The sets and costumes and whatnot are not as fresh and vibrant as one would witness in modern cinema (the recent `The Other Boleyn Girl' is a marvelous example of how orgasmic these modern period films can look) but what doesn't feel dated is the marvelous performances and the smartly written and intricately woven script.
`The Lion in Winter' is a brilliant testament to the fact that no matter when a film was made, if it was made right it will stand the test of time.
Deeply moving. April 26, 2008
ADRIENNE MILLER (TENNESSEE)
1 out of 1 found this review helpful
The Lion in Winter is a breath of fresh air. I just happened to come across this classic film on t.v. one night and boy this movie is a masterpiece. Katharine Hepburn and Peter O'Toole are flawless! Their acting abilities are top-notch, no wonder critics swoon over both these talented thespians. I highly recommend this medieval treasure, enjoy!
|
|
|
